Ang grupo na iyong pinagpapaskilan ay isang grupo ng Usenet. Ang mga mensaheng naipaskil sa grupong ito ay gagawing nakikita ang iyong email address sa sinuman sa Internet.
Taking the chance of embarassing myself yet again, another stupid rules question.
Are cards like Govern the Unanligned Superior (The Call,...) considered to be "actions to put vampires into play"? Or more specific, would Jibade el-Bahrawi do a Superior Enchant Kindred at an inherent +2 stealth?
The only reason I ever came up with this is because a very experienced player told me so. My own initial answer would have been "NO".
Jibade el-Bahrawi Clan: Ishtarri (group 4) Capacity: 9 Disciplines: CEL DEM FOR PRE aus Laibon: Jibade gets +1 stealth when recruiting, employing, or taking an action to put a vampire in play. Allies and retainers cost him 1 less blood or pool.
> Jibade el-Bahrawi > Clan: Ishtarri (group 4) > Capacity: 9 > Disciplines: CEL DEM FOR PRE aus > Laibon: Jibade gets +1 stealth when recruiting, employing, or taking > an action to put a vampire in play. Allies and retainers cost him 1 > less blood or pool.
>Esteban wrote: >> Taking the chance of embarassing myself yet again, another stupid >> rules question.
>> Are cards like Govern the Unanligned Superior (The Call,...) >> considered to be "actions to put vampires into play"?
>No. Nothing in their card text says to put a vampire in play.
>> Or more >> specific, would Jibade el-Bahrawi do a Superior Enchant Kindred at an >> inherent +2 stealth?
>No.
>> The only reason I ever came up with this is because a very experienced >> player told me so. My own initial answer would have been "NO".
>Attaboy. Looks like you're now the master.
>> Jibade el-Bahrawi >> Clan: Ishtarri (group 4) >> Capacity: 9 >> Disciplines: CEL DEM FOR PRE aus >> Laibon: Jibade gets +1 stealth when recruiting, employing, or taking >> an action to put a vampire in play. Allies and retainers cost him 1 >> less blood or pool.
What if Jibade goes Into the Fire, is given a Quietus Skill card. Does he gain stealth for Undue Influence?
Morgan Vening - "There's no such thing as a stupid question." "Really?" "Don't take it as a challenge."
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:46:27 -0800 (PST), Robert Scythe
<tbel...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Nov 5, 5:19 am, LSJ <vtes...@white-wolf.com> wrote: >> Morgan Vening wrote: >> > What if Jibade goes Into the Fire, is given a Quietus Skill card. Does >> > he gain stealth for Undue Influence?
>Was that a trick question since Into The Fire makes him Sabbat but he >still needs to be Anarch?
I messed up. For some reason I saw Laibon as a title (when it's obviously Magaji that is), so sought to remove that first. Then there would have been the 'go anarch in some way' step in there.
All in all, I ballsed up the example on specifics, but LSJ saw the meaning.
>> Only if that Undue Influence action will put a vampire into play.
>So, if Merged Lambach manages to meet the criteria he can untap. And >that final Undue cannot be done by a sterile Anarch vampire, eh? >That's funny.
|
