Ang grupo na iyong pinagpapaskilan ay isang grupo ng Usenet. Ang mga mensaheng naipaskil sa grupong ito ay gagawing nakikita ang iyong email address sa sinuman sa Internet.
At 25 Oct 2009 13:52:09 -0400 Douglas J. Steele wrote:
> Is it possible to hook my laptop to my Omnia via Bluetooth and use the > Omnia's Internet connection?
> While I had no problem pairing the two, the only services I'm seeing > offered are Active Sync Bluetooth Service and Image Responder.
See if your Omnia has a program called "Internet Sharing" pre-installed on it. It allows you to use the device as a cellular modem. Unfortunately, it's a optional Windows Mobile component and is sometimes removed by mobile operators to prevent you from tethering on your data plan.
> At 25 Oct 2009 13:52:09 -0400 Douglas J. Steele wrote: >> Is it possible to hook my laptop to my Omnia via Bluetooth and use the >> Omnia's Internet connection?
>> While I had no problem pairing the two, the only services I'm seeing >> offered are Active Sync Bluetooth Service and Image Responder.
> See if your Omnia has a program called "Internet Sharing" pre-installed > on it. It allows you to use the device as a cellular modem. > Unfortunately, it's a optional Windows Mobile component and is sometimes > removed by mobile operators to prevent you from tethering on your data > plan.
Thanks, Todd. Fortunately, it had Internet Sharing, and I was able to create a Bluetooth PAN.
> At 25 Oct 2009 13:52:09 -0400 Douglas J. Steele wrote: > > Is it possible to hook my laptop to my Omnia via Bluetooth and use the > > Omnia's Internet connection?
> > While I had no problem pairing the two, the only services I'm seeing > > offered are Active Sync Bluetooth Service and Image Responder.
> See if your Omnia has a program called "Internet Sharing" pre-installed > on it. It allows you to use the device as a cellular modem. > Unfortunately, it's a optional Windows Mobile component and is sometimes > removed by mobile operators to prevent you from tethering on your data > plan.
Good point but if he is using bluetooth it should see it as a Network Connection even if Internet Sharing is not running. What I'd like to know is what bluetooth software he is using. I'm familiar with Toshiba, different flavors of Windcomm and I've even seen Linksys bluetooth software in action.
As a matter of fact I recently learned how to reconnect a Bluetooth mouse. Just move it or click a button and wait a few seconds. Pretty simple huh?
BTW I've messed with a Samsung i910 or Omnia and I couldn't get it to use the BT DUN on my own phone so I'm not real thrilled about them.
Now I have a question for you since you know about a TC1100. What do you know about an LE1700 other than it is discontinued also?
dear sir/madam i use htc touch diamond pocket pc3 i want a use internet through my pc can this posible plz send me any good suggetion .i m very thankfull to u.
> "Todd Allcock" <eleccon...@AnoOspamL.com> wrote in message > news:nDaFm.45021$4E.13266@newsfe08.iad... >> At 25 Oct 2009 13:52:09 -0400 Douglas J. Steele wrote: >> > Is it possible to hook my laptop to my Omnia via Bluetooth and use the >> > Omnia's Internet connection?
>> > While I had no problem pairing the two, the only services I'm seeing >> > offered are Active Sync Bluetooth Service and Image Responder.
>> See if your Omnia has a program called "Internet Sharing" pre-installed >> on it. It allows you to use the device as a cellular modem. >> Unfortunately, it's a optional Windows Mobile component and is sometimes >> removed by mobile operators to prevent you from tethering on your data >> plan.
> Good point but if he is using bluetooth it should see it as a Network > Connection even if Internet Sharing is not running. What I'd like to know > is what bluetooth software he is using. I'm familiar with Toshiba, > different flavors of Windcomm and I've even seen Linksys bluetooth > software > in action.
I'm certainly no BT expert, but isn't the network connection between a WinMo device and a PC profile dependent? You wouldn't see a network connection unless using PAN or Activesync- e.g. a serial-based connection or OBEX file transfer wouldn't set up a network connection, would it?
> BTW I've messed with a Samsung i910 or Omnia and I couldn't get it to use > the BT DUN on my own phone so I'm not real thrilled about them.
> Now I have a question for you since you know about a TC1100. What do you > know about an LE1700 other than it is discontinued also?
Sorry, Roger- not a thing, unfortunately. (Which is only a little less than I actually know about the TC1100 to which I only have played with a few times, but like them. IIRC, in this NG, Werner is a lot more familiar with the 1100, and in the cell phone NGs I believe Steve Scharf has discussed them a bit.)
I use PDANet on a Touch Diamond so I can use BT DUN instead of BT PAN. I've tried both BT DUN and BT PAN and even though BT DUN takes longer to setup initially once it is setup it is easier to use than BT PAN.
If you want to try using PDANet I would suggest you set it up not to use "Proxy Mode" because it will connect faster. But if you want Internet on both your phone and a laptop at the same time then you have to use "Proxy Mode."
----------
"Todd Allcock" <eleccon...@AnoOspamL.com> wrote in message
> I'm certainly no BT expert, but isn't the network connection between a WinMo > device and a PC profile dependent?
From what I've seen of Toshiba BT software it will show a "Network Connection" even if Internet Sharing is not active.
> You wouldn't see a network connection > unless using PAN or Activesync- e.g. a serial-based connection or OBEX file > transfer wouldn't set up a network connection, would it?
It doesn't appear to work like that on Broadcom software either. I still get the option for using BT PAN even when I am not using Internet Sharing. But I will not get the option to use BT DUN if I disable PDANet so that part of it works.
> > Now I have a question for you since you know about a TC1100. What do you > > know about an LE1700 other than it is discontinued also?
> Sorry, Roger- not a thing, unfortunately. (Which is only a little less than > I actually know about the TC1100 to which I only have played with a few > times, but like them. IIRC, in this NG, Werner is a lot more familiar with > the 1100, and in the cell phone NGs I believe Steve Scharf has discussed > them a bit.)
Yes, I remember a post from Werner about the TC1100 and Windows 7 too.
Let me tell you something funny about the LE1700 by Motion Computing.. The LE1700 is also a Tablet computer that was given a fast processor because it's predecessor the LE1600 was too slow. But with the faster processor the LE1700 heats up and doesn't have a very long battery life so they discontinued it and came out with yet another Tablet called a J3400.
"mohsin78 via PocketPCJunkies.com" <u55494@uwe> wrote in message news:9e35c747e87c7@uwe...
> dear sir/madam > i use htc touch diamond pocket pc3 i want a use internet > through my pc can this posible plz send me any good suggetion .i m very > thankfull to u.
The first thing you might want to do is check with your provider to see if they allow you to use your phone for the Internet.
Some providers allow Internet access via your cell phone and some providers charge extra to use your phone for the Internet.
BTW there used to be a page on windowsmobile.com that gave step by step instructions for using BT DUN that helped me out but I can't find it anymore. It looks like it was removed when Microsoft tried to phase out BT DUN with BT PAN.
> BTW there used to be a page on windowsmobile.com that gave step by > step instructions for using BT DUN that helped me out but I can't find > it anymore. It looks like it was removed when Microsoft tried to > phase out BT DUN with BT PAN.
> > BTW there used to be a page on windowsmobile.com that gave step by > > step instructions for using BT DUN that helped me out but I can't find > > it anymore. It looks like it was removed when Microsoft tried to > > phase out BT DUN with BT PAN.
Thanks because your page is very inforative and cool because you even mention a TC1100 again. Talking about the TC1100 have you looked at a LE1600, LE1700 or J3400 yet? The funny thing about the LE1700 is they put such a hot running processor into it that it makes a better Desktop Computer than a Tablet computer.
BTW the page I saw that I think was on windowsmobile.com showed how to setup a WM6 device as a client instead of a Server and I wish I'd kept a copy of that page.
> Thanks because your page is very inforative and cool because you even > mention a TC1100 again. Talking about the TC1100 have you looked at a > LE1600, LE1700 or J3400 yet? The funny thing about the LE1700 is they > put such a hot running processor into it that it makes a better > Desktop Computer than a Tablet computer.
Nope, the TC1100 is just the right Tablet PC for me, perfectly suitable for bed-time Web surfing - or, doing the same while outside and I do need the higher resolution / Flash compliance not present in my iPhone 3G S (the device I regularly use for Web browsing outside, while walking from/to work and the like), particularly now that I have a ruggerized case for it.
I want my "real" computer to have at least a 15" IPS (or of similar, excellent quality) screen and the resolution of UXGA (1600*1200) or more. A tablet computer just can't deliver this, mostly because of the screen size and technology (IPS is heavy and consumes far more power than TN-Film).
> > Thanks because your page is very inforative and cool because you even > > mention a TC1100 again. Talking about the TC1100 have you looked at a > > LE1600, LE1700 or J3400 yet? The funny thing about the LE1700 is they > > put such a hot running processor into it that it makes a better > > Desktop Computer than a Tablet computer.
> Nope, the TC1100 is just the right Tablet PC for me, perfectly suitable for > bed-time Web surfing - or, doing the same while outside and I do need the > higher resolution / Flash compliance not present in my iPhone 3G S (the > device I regularly use for Web browsing outside, while walking from/to work > and the like), particularly now that I have a ruggerized case for it.
> I want my "real" computer to have at least a 15" IPS (or of similar, > excellent quality) screen and the resolution of UXGA (1600*1200) or more. A > tablet computer just can't deliver this, mostly because of the screen size > and technology (IPS is heavy and consumes far more power than TN-Film).
And I know of a slate/tablet computer with a 12 inch screen that can do 1400x1050. It is the LE1700 but it also has an oddball 1.8 in hard drive so that is a big drawback. BTW the 1400x1050 resoution might have been an option on that device. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2107214,00.asp
But back to the TC1000. Mine has lost two of the little screws in the middle on the bottom. The only screw left in the middle is the one that holds the battery in. You wouldn't know where I can get some more little screws for it would you? TIA.
Plus, I'm thinking of upgrading the Bluetooth module on my TC1000 so I can put newer Bluetooth software on it and use A2DP. I'm hoping the chip used is compatible with other Bluetooth chips that HP uses like the http://www.getpartsonline.com/397922-001-dc020005100.html
> But back to the TC1000. Mine has lost two of the little screws in the > middle on the bottom. The only screw left in the middle is the one that > holds the battery in. You wouldn't know where I can get some more little > screws for it would you? TIA.
> Plus, I'm thinking of upgrading the Bluetooth module on my TC1000 so I can > put newer Bluetooth software on it and use A2DP. I'm hoping the chip used > is compatible with other Bluetooth chips that HP uses like the > http://www.getpartsonline.com/397922-001-dc020005100.html
Oops both those should have said TC1100 instead of TC1000.
> I know of a Laptop with a15 inch screen that can do 1600x1200. It is > the Dell Inspiron 8000 but not all of the Inspiron 8000s had that > resolution. http://pcworld.about.com/news/May012001id48263.htm
Yup, thanks - I have two Thinkpads (the t42p and the a31p) with a 15" 1600*1200 IPS screen. They're simply wonderful and just can't be compared to any TN film cr*p. (I'm planning to buy a 15.4" WUXGA t61p as a Christmas present to myself, though.)
> And I know of a slate/tablet computer with a 12 inch screen that can > do 1400x1050. It is the LE1700 but it also has an oddball 1.8 in hard > drive so that is a big drawback. BTW the 1400x1050 resoution might > have been an option on that device. > http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2107214,00.asp
Yup, there're 12" SXGA+ models - but they're all using TN Film screens (read: bad constrast, bad view angle, bad everything except for price and weight)
> But back to the TC1000. Mine has lost two of the little screws in the > middle on the bottom. The only screw left in the middle is the one > that holds the battery in. You wouldn't know where I can get some > more little screws for it would you? TIA.
I've taken out the screw from the battery so that I can quickly swap batteries. The battery has never wanted to fall out - it's firmly in its slot. Does yours? If it does, did you look around on HP's homepage /ebay for spare screws?
> Plus, I'm thinking of upgrading the Bluetooth module on my TC1000 so I > can put newer Bluetooth software on it and use A2DP. I'm hoping the > chip used is compatible with other Bluetooth chips that HP uses like > the http://www.getpartsonline.com/397922-001-dc020005100.html
I think some of the capabilities only depend on the operating system, not the hardware. For example, A2DP works just wonderful (something I would never have thought) on my TC1100 under Windows 7. Ae you using XP TE on your TC1100? Then, consider upgrading - W7 is way better, particularly on a tablet because of the way better handscript recognition and the other tablet goodies (also present in Vista BTW). And you won't have problems with A2DP either.
> Yup, thanks - I have two Thinkpads (the t42p and the a31p) with a 15" > 1600*1200 IPS screen. They're simply wonderful and just can't be > compared to any TN film cr*p. (I'm planning to buy a 15.4" WUXGA t61p as > a Christmas present to myself, though.)
I hope you can get one with bluetooth builtin because the one in the URL above doesn't say anything about bluetooth.
> I've taken out the screw from the battery so that I can quickly swap > batteries.
I wouldn't want to swap batteries because the battery that came with it doesn't last very long.
> The battery has never wanted to fall out - it's firmly in its > slot. Does yours?
Good point. I don't need to put that particular scew in there but with the other two missing I think I should leave it in there.
> If it does, did you look around on HP's homepage /ebay > for spare screws?
Thanks and one of these days I might check into that.
> And you won't have problems with A2DP either.
When I put Windows 7 on a laptop I couldn't use that laptop as a headset for my phone. But then again, that particular laptop might have been using a Toshiba BT adapter instead of a Broadcom adapter.
My TC1100 has XP Tablet on it with the latest BT driver I could find for it. I've never been able to get the Windows 7 I have to network to any of my other computers when I put it on a Toshiba laptop so I'm not looking forward to trying it again.
> When I put Windows 7 on a laptop I couldn't use that laptop as a > headset for my phone. But then again, that particular laptop might > have been using a Toshiba BT adapter instead of a Broadcom adapter.
Dunno - I'll test whether using the MS BT stack comin with W7 supports headset mode (to work as a headset, that is).
> My TC1100 has XP Tablet on it with the latest BT driver I could find > for it.
Yup, I have it too (I think) - it's very old (year 2004? 2005? way before the a2dp revolution); no wonder it doesn't support a2dp.
> I've never been able to get the Windows 7 I have to network to > any of my other computers when I put it on a Toshiba laptop so I'm not > looking forward to trying it again.
1. As opposed to XP? 2. You don't need to uninstall your current XP to give W7 a go. If you are afraid of re-partitioning your HDD (if you don't have a "clean" partition you could install it to), you can still install it in a VirtualBox or VMWare box. (Actually, this is how I use Win7 from Hackintosh on my t42p when booted into OS-X to do some iPhone hacking / development.) With that, you can see whether it sees your network. 3. now, the final version of W7 is available - the one you've tried may have been an earlier build / version. The final version is stated to be even better than even RC1 (at least when it comes to at least the h.264 decoder, some say - I'm not sure they're right, though.) If this problem was caused by a bug, then, the final W7 may help you - and it has a lot of other goodies (much better input recognition and, of course, A2DP).
|
